From TriasWiki
Category structure
How to change the category structure of this wiki?
| old structure
| new structure
|
- TRIAS e-Government Themes
- Domain
- Domain: Geographic
- Domain: Government
- Domain: Legislation
- Domain: Services
- Government
- Knowledge-based e-government
- Organisational culture
- Organisational structure
- Permits
- Policy/governance
- E-Democracy
- Policy consultations
- Zoning policy
- Quality of society
- Education policy
- Health care
- Safety
- Registration
- Services
- Zoning plans
- (?)Zoning plans
- Organization
- Implementation
- Quality control and Evaluation
- Regulation
- Cultural regulation
- Regulation: Legislation
- Regulatory practice
- Society
- Society: Organisations
- Society: Professionals
- Society: Users
- Technology
- Basic Technological concepts
- IT architecture
- Standards
- Technology: Explanations
- Technology: Products
- Technology: Suppliers
|
- The Information Society
- Public value
- Governance
- eDemocracy
- Institutions
- Users
- Professionals
- Government-specific domains, including:
- Legislation and Regulation
- Politics and decision-making
- Organisation of Government
- Public Administration and Management
- Public Services
- Themes, issues and policy areas
- Safety
- Health care
- Education policy
- Cohesion and inclusion
- Context-relevant domains, such as:
- Technology
- IT Architecture
- Standards
- Products
- Suppliers
- Methods (Rob)
|
Category notation
Several categories mention their supercategory in the category name (eg. 'Technology:products'). I would propose to not make a habit or even a rule of this, since it makes restructuring more work. However, in 'low-level' categories confusion with other categories may be avoided by using such title-aggregation sparingly.
- Proposal
- Use category name 'Product (technology)' instead of 'Technology:product', see also the (discussion at) Wikipedia help&conventions...